A third of Salt Lake City high schoolers feel weapons detectors don't increase security, survey shows

07/05/2024 14:00

Weapons detectors making students late to class. Complaints that screenings are "not very accurate." Concerns the devices provide a "false sense of security."

These were some of the responses the Salt Lake City School District received when it surveyed teachers, students and parents about the machines that were installed at West, East and Highland high schools in October.

According to survey data a district official presented to board members in April, a little over a third of students at the high schools reported that they do not believe the weapons detectors increase their safety during the school day. Around 40% of teachers felt the same way.

Yet when parents answered, 46% said they felt students were safer. Leeson Taylor, the district's chief officer of school leadership and performance, told board members that the question was designed to gauge "perception" of the devices.

"The perception of the parents is straight on, what you said — it's perception," board member Kristi Swett told Taylor. "But as I look at who's actually in the building, it's a little disconcerting."

The weapons detectors were installed at the high schools last fall, after board members in January 2023 approved a $1.44 million expenditure to lease them. More funds were also approved later last year to support installing the devices at Horizonte Instruction and Training Center, the district's alternative high school. Those devices were rolled out in March.

In a separate survey question, the district asked West, East and Highland highstudents, teachers and parents, "How have the weapons detectors changed your feelings about your school this year?"

In response to the general statement, "I feel the school is safer," around 47% of students said they "somewhat" or "strongly" agree, while almost 22% said that they "somewhat" or "strongly" disagree.

When teachers answered, about 48% said they"somewhat" or "strongly" agree with the statement, while 33% "somewhat" or "strongly" disagreed.

Students share specific concerns

In more specific survey responses obtained by The Salt Lake Tribune through a public records request, one student said that when the devices' alerts go off, security staff "don't actually check the bags." But when staff do decide to check bags, "it takes too much time."

Leeson told board members in April that it is difficult to gather tardiness data, because it's hard to knowwhether the detectors themselves caused a student to be late.

"Let's say school starts at 8:45 [a.m.] — you got somebody that's getting out of a car in the front of the school building at 8:40, 8:43," he said. In that case, he said, a student would likely still be late to class, regardless of the screening process.

At a January board meeting, Leeson also told members that people are not stopped unless an alert is sounded.

According to district data, 126,092 device alerts were logged at the three high schools between Feb. 1 and March 31,the latest reporting period. The alerts were tagged with descriptors of what was detected, if anything, includingcomputers and other technology; umbrellas; and "gun/law enforcement."

District spokesperson Yándary Chatwin said the "gun/law enforcement" alert tag only pertains to adults carrying firearms.

She added that the devices detected no studentscarrying firearms in the February and Marchreporting period.Within that time frame, however, the district took disciplinary action against two students, meaning administrators contacted families regarding "found items." It is unclear what those items were.

'A waste of taxpayer money,' one teacher says

According to the survey responses, some students feel the machines don't work properly.

"I've seen officers walk through and [the machines] not go off, even though the officer is carrying multiple weapons," one response stated. "They're fickle machines in the fact that sometimes my bag gets flagged for no reason, and sometimes it doesn't."

Other students felt that weapons could still be snuck into school, the responses indicate — such as if a person with a weapon came to school before 8 a.m. or after 4:30 p.m., the window during which the weapons detectors operate.

Leeson acknowledged that the devices "are not the end-all, be-all," but instead one piece of security intended to keep students safe.

More security measures are expected in accordance with legislation passed this year, Chatwin said, including HB84, from Rep. Ryan Wilcox, R-Ogden, which allows a designated school employee — or a "school guardian" — to be armed and trained to respond in emergency situations.

A school guardian can be any school staffer, excluding teachers or principals. The same law also requires that public schools install panic buttons in every classroom.

In addition to the over $1 million spent on leasing the weapons detectors, the district also approved spending $1.1 million in August to staff the detectors through PalAmerican Security Inc.

One of the "negative themes" the district found in its survey was that, as one teacher said, the move felt like"a waste of taxpayer money that could be better allocated to other needs."

Parents expressed similar concerns, with one describing the devices as"security theater that makes people feel safer without actually accomplishing anything at a huge cost."

Chatwin said the decision to lease out the devices for 48 months amounted to a "trial period."

"If we find that there hasn't been any benefit and it might not be worth the cost, then we won't renew that lease," she said. "But to really see what impact this could have, we're going to keep it for the full length of that lease and evaluate it from there."